In my last post, I said that I was getting off the boat, stepping onto the shore, and heading into the brush to find the gems in my story so that I could finish this film. Now, almost two years later and with the film not yet done, I think it is fair to ask if I’m lost in the jungle. The answer – maybe I was, for awhile, but not anymore.
Independent documentary. The first word says so much more than the second. Independent means you as a filmmaker are beholden to no one other than your film. There’s a lot of integrity in that. It also (usually) means that you’re on your own financially. And being on your own financially means having to do the work largely by yourself – which, on a film like this can be overwhelming at times. That’s what happened on Block 57. Sean put up most of the cash. I put in most of the sweat. And while that was enough to take four trips to South America, shoot an awful lot of tape, and get a lot of great stuff (along with a few bug bites), it wasn’t enough to speed the post-production process along as fast as we would have liked.
Then there were the occasions when I had to take time off to earn a paycheck as an editor on television shows – many thanks to my friends Kevin and Mechelle at Intuitive Entertainment for their willingness to hire me whenever I was available and, more recently, to Elise at World of Wonder, where I spent four months this spring editing a series called “Finding Sarah” for Oprah’s new network. Ideally, I would have only been working on Block 57 until it was completed, but my landlord has a thing about actually getting a rent check from me. It’s the basic economic reality of a lot of indie docs, including mine. [As a perfect example, since starting this blog entry, I took a week+ off to edit a pilot at World of Wonder…]
The other thing that slowed the completion of this film was just the sheer amount of footage we had. Block 57 could go any number of ways and I found it difficult to start down any single path. I guess that’s true with any film, but it seemed worse on this one. Maybe it was because of the scope of the story and the number of different themes and topics covered in the shoots. It definitely wasn’t as limited or as defined as other documentaries when it was shot – and the blame for that lies primarily with me as the film’s director – and that clarity would have to come during the editing process. I had a wall covered with notes, and I can confess I sometimes couldn’t see the rain forest for all the words. Add to that a film that is almost entirely in Spanish – with some indigenous languages thrown in – and you have a recipe for a slow edit.
The good news (and you were waiting for that, I know) is that we have emerged from the darkness of indecision and economically mandated breaks into the light of a plan, and of progress. The biggest change came when I realized I had to flip the normal editing process on its head to get this film done. Usually you’ll go through your footage, write a script, and cut your film to that script. With Block 57, my biggest challenge was writing a script when I had 100 or so interviews to choose from. So I decided to ignore them. Rather than writing a script from the interviews and using the scenes shot in country to illustrate them, I would cut stand alone scenes without supporting interviews (for instance, an indigenous man showing us a God awful clinic paid for by an oil company) and then go back and add interview bites to support and connect those scenes. I wouldn’t write an 80 minute film, I would be cutting a lot of stand alone 1-10 minute scenes. I would then see which scenes – and themes – resonated the most and use those to make the film. It was a way to winnow down the interview footage to a more manageable size. And by cutting all the scenes – not just the ones that would have been necessary had I written a script – I know that the strongest material will work its way into the film.
The downside to this approach is that it takes more time. The upside is that I am able to bring in outside help. With the conventional method, I could never get other editors to help me because I was never sure what material I could give them. With a more modular approach, I could break off short scenes and have other editors take a first pass. Although I would have to go through those scenes and do my fixes, their work did save me a lot of time. Many thanks to the editors who donated their time for his project – Carissa, Luis, John, Jim and Kyle. It’s been a real help.
I guess the light bulb flashed on for me one day when I was thinking about what one remembers from a film, especially a documentary. A few scenes and characters, a couple of beautiful images, a few facts and/or arguments, and a certain emotion you felt watching the film – that’s about it. Viewers don’t know the material in a film like the filmmakers do. They’re only going to remember a few things, so it is best not to overload them with too much information. Find out what stuff really resonates and make your film around that. Pretty obvious, probably, but not always easy to get to.
The other thing I realized is that if a native in the jungle standing outside a dilapidated clinic says the same thing about health problems as a lawyer from an NGO in a Lima office, the former is the one that is going to stick with people. The person in scene is a character, and people in an audience will have a stronger emotional connection to that person. And documentaries don’t only connect on an intellectual level, they connect on an emotional level. Therefore, interviews need to be minimized, and when they are used, they have to be stellar. By cutting the scenes first and then adding the interviews later, I think we’ll get where we want to go with this film.
All told, we’ve got close to 50 scenes. Close to 40 are done with a current running time of over three hours. Right now, I’m hoping to be done with these scenes – the backbone of our film – by the end of October. We’ll then have to figure out which scenes/themes are the strongest and find the interviews that work with them. That’s a lot of work, to be sure, but with the scenes cut, the heavy lifting will be over. If all goes well (and what hasn’t gone well with this film so far?) I could get a very rough cut done in a month of editing, which means we’ll have our first cut before the Christmas holidays and should be on track to finish the film in the first quarter of next year.
Basic math tells you that we’ll have a lot of stuff left on the virtual cutting room floor. That just means more scenes to add to the website. We’ll find ways to get this other material out – it deserves an audience, too.
So there you have my editing process to date. Still a ways to go, but things seem to go better when you have a plan. Stay tuned…